Welcome to Ban-Hammer - Australian Gaming Community

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Cloud ☁

Donators™
  • Content count

    608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Cloud ☁ last won the day on December 7 2016

Cloud ☁ had the most liked content!

About Cloud ☁

  • Rank
    TILT CITY
  • Birthday 05/21/2001

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Australia
  • Favourite Server
    Zombies

Recent Profile Visitors

1,608 profile views
  1. Only one question, How is this going to work.
  2. 2.4 WARDENs have to complete each and every order. No one really follows this rule anyway and shouldn't matter unless the situation involves favoritism. 2.19 If a PRISONER tosses a HOT CELL GUN into another cell, that cell becomes a HOT CELL. The original HOT CELL is no longer considered as a HOT CELL. --> The original HOT CELL is no longer considered as a HOT CELL when the gun is found in another cell. Although not necessary, this sometimes causes issues and confusion on the server and I think this change would just make it clearer. 2.38 GUARDs must be willing to WARDEN should the opportunity arise, refusing to do so will result in a swap or CT ban. I don't think players should be forced to do anything unless an admin asks them to do so, as some players prefer to guard rather than warden being two different roles on CT.
  3. This, but from what I've read on your app you seem to want admin to have more fun on the server with admin games rather than trying to rebuild JB and fulfill the needs of the "Bare-Bones project". Because in my opinion the server doesn't need admins todo games, it needs admins to administrate the server and not keep it in the current way where 10 players are on and 3 of they are admins and when they leave everyone else leaves. -1
  4. Neutral I agree with pretty much everything Coby said, although Jordan is probably the most mature candidate so far out of the current trustees, But I still strongly think that the trustees shouldn't be given admin so soon after receiving Trusted.
  5. In no way am I going to be trying to bash Late or his ability to moderate a server. (pre-trusted) Late had two different personas when around you vs when on the server without you / certain admins. Although yes he is very helpful and that is a good trait he has, and still needs to I don't think it's necessary for me to go into detail about his personas prior to receiving trusted, as after receiving his previous behavior changed significantly after receiving a role in staff someone shouldn't COMPLETELY change how they act because that should've happened before they got such a role. 90% of players who wanted a position in staff and were helpful, but that didn't completely suck up your ass. Like I said I'm not bashing Late or anything, I consider myself and late as good friends, and I try not to be biased when it comes to talking about players, although since it is an opinionated topic it can be hard not to as it's what someone perceives of a player with their own experiences with them. Can you stop being so edgy and reply with actual criticism or just -1 for input rather than being just plain rude?
  6. -1 Considering from the time you have received Trusted member to now considering the server has been very much dead, I don't think you are ready or capable of fulfilling the role of Admin that the server needs right now to be able to revive the population of the server. I also think you aren't suitable for a promotion until you prove yourself in the time coming because you have not had the chance to do so yet.
  7. +1 is a flamer nice and handles server well.
  8. Actual day. Plus this would also ultimately determine if it's a good stable event or if it would kill the server.
  9. Coming off of what @NightHawk said, If this was to somehow get put into consideration, Instead of causing problems by making it a special day or what-not, have it as a weekend special or something. I remember playing this on CSS (not sure what server maybe old resistance jb or something) but it was interesting and does spark creativity which is what JB players currently lack. If this was to happen, make it happen occasionally for a day or something and see how the community reacts to it.
  10. I think this would be better as of the server lately only seems to hit tops of around 20. This is probably because of school etc, but to be able to play those maps would be nice for the players. I haven't been active on the servers lately but from just looking at the admins and since I know quite a lot of them have school and jobs now and being just more interested in different games right now, I believe the Director team and Trusted should look into getting more trusted members to help control the server. With everything that has been happening lately it seems that BH is just on a downfall, So don't let that be true and keeping trying your hardest to keep the server(s) running.
  11. HELL YEAH LETS GO 4V4 VERSUS SALT FREE ZONE I SWEAR!11!!
  12. I think this would be a better option as it would allow players to vote for hunger games when there is a set amount of players on the server eg 6 to start voting.
  13. I think having it on a timer would be fine, and I don't see many players abusing this THAT bad and if they do admins can just swiftly bane them. But I agree to have it so only 1 person can do it every say 2 mins or w/e would also be nice.
  14. I don't know how I feel about this, so say if warden was to color T's for say a three team game, what happens if a T decides to turn it off. Also I don't understand where you're getting at with the whole because I personally don't agree this would generate much hype for the community to donate because it seems like a meh/useless feature. Although it is a some what ok idea, I don't think it has enough thought into it/enough uses to have devs use time on coding it, when they could use their time on more important matters.
  15. I don't know what you mean, and to make a new special day would be a lot of work and a lot of trial and error, Plus they had only just made a new zombie day a couple months before the removal. And don't forget most of the players liked zombie day, In my opinion the safe choice would be just fix zombie day and reimplement it.